The Back to 60 movement, which campaigns for justice for women affected by changes to the state pension age, continues to fight for their cause. Despite setbacks and disappointments, the movement remains determined and committed to achieving its goals.
The core issue at the heart of the Back to 60 movement is the controversial changes made to the state pension age for women born in the 1950s. These changes, implemented by the government in 2011, meant that affected women had to wait longer to receive their pension. Many of these women claim that they were not given adequate notice of the changes and were unfairly penalized as a result.
Since its inception, the Back to 60 movement has gained significant traction and support. Its members have been vocal and active, organizing protests, rallies, and legal challenges in their quest for justice. Their efforts have brought their cause to the attention of policymakers, the media, and the public.
However, the movement has faced several setbacks along the way. In 2019, the High Court ruled against the Back to 60 campaign’s legal challenge, stating that the changes to the state pension age were not discriminatory. The judge argued that while the impact on women may have been unfair, it was not unlawful.
Despite this major blow, the Back to 60 movement refused to give up. They remained steadfast in their determination to seek justice, vowing to take the case to the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court. Back to 60 founder, Joanne Welch, has repeatedly affirmed that the fight will continue until all the affected women receive their rightful state pension.
In a new and significant development, the Back to 60 movement has recently secured a hearing at the Court of Appeal. The hearing, scheduled for July 21, 2021, will allow the campaign’s legal team to present their arguments once again. This opportunity is seen by the movement as a glimmer of hope, a chance to reignite the fight for justice.
The Back to 60 movement continues to gather support from individuals, organizations, and politicians who believe that these women have been treated unfairly. The Labour Party and the Scottish National Party (SNP) have both expressed their support for the campaign’s cause. They promise to address the state pension age issue if they gain power.
The impact of the changes to the state pension age cannot be underestimated. Many women have faced financial hardships and struggled to make ends meet due to the delay in receiving their pension. The Back to 60 movement argues that these women were left without adequate time to prepare for their retirement, resulting in significant financial and emotional stress.
The fight for justice led by the Back to 60 movement serves as a reminder that vulnerable groups should not be ignored or marginalized. These women, who have dedicated their lives to work and contributing to society, deserve to be heard and treated fairly. Their battle is not just for themselves but for the principles of social justice and equality.
As the Court of Appeal hearing approaches, the Back to 60 movement continues to gather momentum and support. The fight for justice is far from over, and although the path may be challenging, these determined women are refusing to back down. The movement serves as an inspiration for future campaigns and calls for a fairer society for all.